Well I just know that in the beginning times of the SCP foundation, they had someone become a model or symbol for the site, a fictional user created to inspire the 'realism' of the site. Depth to sites universe. Now Im not saying follow that path because that is not us. Its the basis that if someone is going to keep complete order of the site, we need someone entirely responsible for the whole of the site. If a major problem came up that concerned other sites with ours, no one is going to hear the answers from you or me or Cad. There gonna look at the master admin, why because he is still technically considered active and around. The Administrator was a second user for someone else, while the original creator of the admin helped create articles and other things on the SCP site.
I understand that Hock is the one who moved us over to this new site, but his activity has become almost nothing. We need more than just us three taking responsibility over this site that will possibly grow into over 300+ users at this rate by the end of June. Yes I can see that the idea seems pointless but if my knowledge is correct, someone can do a lot more to a site if they are MA. As far as I know.
Voting?…Either you or Cad. And the cooperation of Hock to understand that he can either fulfill a leadership role on the site or step down as MA so we can carve a path to becoming more than just a simple 100+ user site and possible have 800+ or 900+ users by June (I know that it seems unlikely but it may happen, who knows)
Nouva Edit: In short, we need a responsible MA to:
- Show a symbol of leadership to the site.
- Make use of resources to help expand the site's popularity.
- Make efforts to improve the site itself.
- Communicate well with other members just like any other admin would.
- Encourage other admins and moderators to do a good job.
I'm also just thinking in the interest of the site as the quality of our site should always be the main goal and I believe having a MA that is able to help others and become a symbol for the Chaos Insurgency site will indeed be more beneficial than just seeing this as unneeded.