Log 09/19/2014

<Cadbury>: Ed?
<EdAWACS>: I'mma here
<Cadbury>: Sure. What's up?
<EdAWACS>: I was dozing off a bit
<EdAWACS>: didn't get much sleep last night
<EdAWACS>: You wanted to talk about AlexTSB
<Cadbury>: Eh. Take your time.
<EdAWACS>: So we'll discuss taht
<Cadbury>: Torin. Yeah. He's making the site his personal bitch-fit audience.
<EdAWACS>: I already staff-posted on one
<EdAWACS>: Personally I'm going to say he's not really much of an annoyance
<EdAWACS>: He hasn't exactly broken any rules
<Cadbury>: But he's not productive, is he?
<EdAWACS>: Well he isn't disruptive much either really
<Cadbury>: Also, his threat to Staff is not what I would like to wake up on a pleasant Saturday morning to.
<EdAWACS>: It wasn't a threat what threat?
<Cadbury>: We're familiar with his previous offenses of spam
<EdAWACS>: Spam?
<Cadbury>: He's a ticking bomb, Ed. He will not give any benefit to the site. Whykeep him around?
<EdAWACS>: Cause to kick him would be a gross violation of staff powers
<EdAWACS>: Listen
<Cadbury>: Would it?
<EdAWACS>: I know you may think he's a prick and I'll admit he's a bit irritating
<Cadbury>: He's a prick all right.
<EdAWACS>: But the truth is he hasn't broken any big rules
<EdAWACS>: nor any I could see
<Cadbury>: Are we going to wait until he does?
<EdAWACS>: YEs
<EdAWACS>: Why should we kick him now
<EdAWACS>: That would be setting the bomb off prematurely
<Cadbury>: An ounce of prevention, you know
<EdAWACS>: Yes but still as I've stated before until he's really stepped out of line
<EdAWACS>: There's nothing we should do against him
<Cadbury>: Thing is, he's the sort of guy who would take his rants anywhere
<Cadbury>: Stop him here, he's going to bitch about it on the next site he comes across
<EdAWACS>: Ranting isn't a punishable offence in itself
<Cadbury>: But it is an annoying offence
<EdAWACS>: You'd notice I only called him out on the pretext of his using sexual slur
<EdAWACS>: I did however advise him to be polite
<EdAWACS>: This person is clearly under a lot of pressure
<Cadbury>: Spam, ASCII art and attention-whoring. That's on his rap sheet now.
<EdAWACS>: He hasn't committed these offences on our sites
<Cadbury>: Invite him to chat?
<EdAWACS>: No I'd like to keep this private
<Cadbury>: Let's see what we can do on the redemption side of things, then?
<EdAWACS>: Your more than welcome to make the thread for him on Falchion Valley
<Cadbury>: No thanks.
<EdAWACS>: Why not?
<EdAWACS>: More staff opinions are welcome
<Cadbury>: I should digress for a bit, Doctor Halsey is a great addition.
<EdAWACS>: Even Zyn recommended we talk it over
<EdAWACS>: Hmmm I may hold back my judgement on that just now
<EdAWACS>: He's 4 days old he's made progress
<Cadbury>: My opinion will rest on disciplinary actions to be considered until more staffers voice.
<Cadbury>: Talk it over with Nouva and Strate, maybe Hock and Heaton if you can. Keep this down low.
<EdAWACS>: Also Cadbury, don't use other sites as input for judgement unless necessary
<EdAWACS>: Torin may have had a dark stain on the Foundation staff
<EdAWACS>: but here I'm giving him a blank slate
<Cadbury>: Clean slate
<Cadbury>: But keep a leash on him. We need a bulldog on staff, Ed
<EdAWACS>: Also some of the 05 policies in my opinion seems to worsen the user backlash
<EdAWACS>: Not that they are wrong
<EdAWACS>: but some of their policies could be a bit moderate
<EdAWACS>: I'm always on watch Cad
<Cadbury>: My procedure is practically this: assessment and action. I'll give him 1 week to see his progress.
<EdAWACS>: Progress?
<Cadbury>: Whether or not he decided to keep it reined in and just have fun
<Cadbury>: Instead of ruining everyone else's
<EdAWACS>: How did he ruin people's fun?
<EdAWACS>: There wasn't any thing there that merited that
<Cadbury>: Mine for most.
<Cadbury>: Personal issue, I know.
<Cadbury>: That shouldn't affect my judgment
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury being staff you can't exactly always consider your own interests
<EdAWACS>: It better not
<EdAWACS>:
<Cadbury>: Let me rephrase that: Torin is muddying my happy fun times. Other users /may/ feel the same.
<EdAWACS>: From what I saw aside from a sexual slur there wasn't anything major
<EdAWACS>: I think one user did
<Cadbury>: But hey, I suppose you're right in that we should give him a clean slate here
<EdAWACS>: Yes we should
<Cadbury>: Wait until he decided to make it stay clean or dirty it up.
<EdAWACS>: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-903506/torin-blackguard-alextsb#post-2113585
<Cadbury>: I know.
<Cadbury>: I check 05 too, you know.
<EdAWACS>: I have my suspicions that Espionage was the one who sent it
<EdAWACS>: The sender wished to be anonymous
<EdAWACS>: but hey
<EdAWACS>: or was it you?
<EdAWACS>:
<Cadbury>: Espionage. What'll I do to get her into the site.
<Cadbury>: Does it read like mine?
<Cadbury>: No
<EdAWACS>: Kinda
<EdAWACS>: in a way
<EdAWACS>: I've been getting complaints about his behavior
<EdAWACS>: That line seems like something a staff would say
<Cadbury>: From who?
<EdAWACS>: not accusing you though
<EdAWACS>: the person who sended the message to Zyn
<Cadbury>: No, the complaints about his behavior line. Who complained?
<EdAWACS>: Sounds like a Staff member
<EdAWACS>: No idea
<Cadbury>: Then the other staff, then.
<EdAWACS>: Also why ask Zyn when they could have asked us?
<EdAWACS>: That was what I though
<Cadbury>: Abrasion. You know him?
<EdAWACS>: Hock?
<EdAWACS>: Yes
<EdAWACS>: But who would complain to abrasion?
<Cadbury>: Abrasion's an SCP guy too. He's poised to aim for Staffship.
<EdAWACS>: on 05?
<Cadbury>: Ours. He PM'd me.
<EdAWACS>: I see
<Cadbury>: Asking who's most likely to become CI Staff next
<EdAWACS>: The next round of promotions aren't commencing for some time
<Cadbury>: Told him it's not an available thing to say.
<EdAWACS>: Good
<Cadbury>: Strate's on
<EdAWACS>: On where?
<Cadbury>: basesix
<Cadbury>: Sent him a Pm to get here
<EdAWACS>: tell him to come to SSSC
<Cadbury>: Done
<Cadbury>: Hey, how come QUAESITOR isn't on sometimes?
<EdAWACS>: ?
<VictorStrate>: Hey.
<Cadbury>: Good
<Cadbury>: Now remember this channel's name.
<EdAWACS>: someone set the channel key

EdAWACS set the channel to mode +k

<EdAWACS>: done
<EdAWACS>: So Strate
<Cadbury>: Strate.
<Cadbury>: Remember that.
<EdAWACS>: we're here to discuss AlexTSB
<EdAWACS>: This is also our first ever SSSC conference
<VictorStrate>: Alright, here I am.
<Cadbury>: So make it count.
<EdAWACS>: We haven't scheduled out a time for regular sessions
<Cadbury>: All agenda and matters on your mind
<Cadbury>: Nor is it likely that I have time for regular sessions
<VictorStrate>: Alright.
<EdAWACS>: Same here
<EdAWACS>: Now down to business
<Cadbury>: So, AlexTSB. Any say on him?
<VictorStrate>: Seems okay.
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury thought differently
<VictorStrate>: I can't see anything wrong, and it doesn't seem like he plans on making himself a problem anytime soon.
<VictorStrate>: Oh.
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury enlighten victor with your views
<Cadbury>: Generally, we narrowed it down that we need to either take prevention now or watch him for 1 week to see his progress on behavior
<VictorStrate>: "Progress"?
<Cadbury>: Ed, the 05 thread, por favor
<EdAWACS>: Whether he messes up or not
<VictorStrate>: Uh oh.
<EdAWACS>: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-903506/torin-blackguard-alextsb#post-2113585
<EdAWACS>: Keep that only in context but don't let that be a basis for judgement
<Cadbury>: .ch Kick, Redeem, Avatar of Vengeance
<QUAESITOR>: Cadbury: Kick
<Cadbury>: Heh
<VictorStrate>: Hm.
<EdAWACS>: SCP Foundation has a different set of rules than our site
<Cadbury>: That said, it's effective but..
<Cadbury>: Ed, your view
<EdAWACS>: I personally feel that we shouldn't judge him based on his record on other sites
<VictorStrate>: As do I.
<Cadbury>: Sax's joining
<EdAWACS>: I mean this isn't like the atmelfti issue where the spammer was found to have a history of spamming
<Cadbury>: Which I killed off
<Cadbury>: A four-spammer attack, really, that's scary
<EdAWACS>: Welcome Sax
<EdAWACS>: to SSSC
<Sax>: Evening.
<Cadbury>: Morning here
<Sax>: Anyways, you've all been keeping track of Torion?
<Cadbury>: Yep
<EdAWACS>: Yes I have Victor not so sure
<Cadbury>: Had some PM exchanges, a chat
<EdAWACS>: We're bringing him up to speed
<Sax>: Alright.
<Sax>: Since you guys run your own site,
<Sax>: How are you going to handle this?
<Cadbury>: Anyways, we're asking whether to monitor his progress or kick him now
<VictorStrate>: I don't feel we should do anything about Alex until he becomes a problem. If something happens and we need to take action, then we should, but I don't think we should do anything until then.
<EdAWACS>: I voted in support of monitoring his progress
<EdAWACS>: He hasn't violated any or our site rules as of yet
<EdAWACS>: I only had to call him out on using a sexual slur
<VictorStrate>: I agree with Ed.
<Cadbury>: Given that we have a considerable reaction time to problems, it's guaranteed proper disciplinary action can be taken quickly
<Cadbury>: But till then, we're deciding to keep an eye on him
<EdAWACS>: As for the ranting portion, it is irritating slightly but still not crossing the line
<Cadbury>: He's voiced out IRL problems in the past.
<VictorStrate>: If anything does happen it can be quickly cleaned up and the proper punishment can be given.
<EdAWACS>: I did advise him of course that he would flourish better if he was more civil
<VictorStrate>: But I don't feel that any of his punishments should be made more harsh because of his record.
<Cadbury>: Flourish. Taking that word with a pinch of salt
<Cadbury>: Of course, Victor
<EdAWACS>: The most I would offer is an official warning on the next infraction
<EdAWACS>: Than we enter banning stage
<VictorStrate>: Well, is that the normal protocol?
<Cadbury>: We shouldn't stack up our punishments on Torin with the ones from SCP
<Cadbury>: Yes.
<EdAWACS>: Since we have different rule sets
<VictorStrate>: Alright.
<EdAWACS>: What do you think Sax?
<Sax>: Looks alright to me.
<Sax>: I'm only nominal advice, anyways.
<Cadbury>: http://falchionvalley.wikidot.com/site-protocols Right there Victor
<Cadbury>: Or not
<Cadbury>: I'll add something if we agree on it
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury the site protocols need an update
<VictorStrate>: Ah.
<EdAWACS>: So all in favor of immediate disciplinary action say aye
<EdAWACS>: All in favor of pardon say yes
<Cadbury>: We need protocols. Now is the best time to think of one
<VictorStrate>: Yes.
<EdAWACS>: Hmmm…. yes we do
<VictorStrate>: I guess we can think of one, but I don't have much to say on the matter.
<Cadbury>: I'm thinking Infraction - Warning, Next Infraction - Warn with Revocation, Next Infraction - Revoke Membership
<EdAWACS>: I mean Cadburys addition on rules for users were vague at best
<EdAWACS>: So Staff Post, Official Warning, Revocation
<Cadbury>: We can set bans, if you like, but who's up to the task of seeing to it that bans are set and lifted as soon as it expires?
<EdAWACS>: I can try but it will be difficult for me seeing as now I have university
<Cadbury>: Revocation to these parts: Revoke with rights to rejoin, revoke with rights to rejoin suspended for __ hours/weeks, revoke permanently
<Cadbury>: Also, someone get this log copy-pasted somewhere safe
<EdAWACS>: No no that won't work
<Cadbury>: Why not?
<EdAWACS>: Seeing as the site is open I'm think they could rejoin with ease
<EdAWACS>: So how about this
<EdAWACS>: Revocation,
<Cadbury>: We…we..
<EdAWACS>: Than 24 hour ban
<Cadbury>: Close the site and enable applications?
<EdAWACS>: No
<Cadbury>: Wait, what about the 24-hour ban?
<EdAWACS>: I don't think just yet we need to implement that feature
<EdAWACS>: block and ban function, time it to 24 hours
<EdAWACS>: that's how it works
<Cadbury>: It proved effective during the spam attack
<EdAWACS>: yep
<Cadbury>: So, steps?
<Cadbury>: From warn to ban
<Cadbury>: But keep a leash on him. We need a bulldog on staff, Ed
<EdAWACS>: Also some of the 05 policies in my opinion seems to worsen the user backlash
<EdAWACS>: Not that they are wrong
<EdAWACS>: but some of their policies could be a bit moderate
<EdAWACS>: I'm always on watch Cad
<Cadbury>: My procedure is practically this: assessment and action. I'll give him 1 week to see his progress.
<EdAWACS>: Progress?
<Cadbury>: Whether or not he decided to keep it reined in and just have fun
<Cadbury>: Instead of ruining everyone else's
<EdAWACS>: How did he ruin people's fun?
<EdAWACS>: There wasn't any thing there that merited that
<Cadbury>: Mine for most.
<Cadbury>: Personal issue, I know.
<Cadbury>: That shouldn't affect my judgment
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury being staff you can't exactly always consider your own interests
<EdAWACS>: It better not
<EdAWACS>:
<Cadbury>: Let me rephrase that: Torin is muddying my happy fun times. Other users /may/ feel the same.
<EdAWACS>: From what I saw aside from a sexual slur there wasn't anything major
<EdAWACS>: I think one user did
<Cadbury>: But hey, I suppose you're right in that we should give him a clean slate here
<EdAWACS>: Yes we should
<Cadbury>: Wait until he decided to make it stay clean or dirty it up.
<EdAWACS>: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-903506/torin-blackguard-alextsb#post-2113585
<Cadbury>: I know.
<Cadbury>: I check 05 too, you know.
<EdAWACS>: I have my suspicions that Espionage was the one who sent it
<EdAWACS>: The sender wished to be anonymous
<EdAWACS>: but hey
<EdAWACS>: or was it you?
<EdAWACS>:
<Cadbury>: Espionage. What'll I do to get her into the site.
<Cadbury>: Does it read like mine?
<Cadbury>: No
<EdAWACS>: Kinda
<EdAWACS>: in a way
<EdAWACS>: I've been getting complaints about his behavior
<EdAWACS>: That line seems like something a staff would say
<Cadbury>: From who?
<EdAWACS>: not accusing you though
<EdAWACS>: the person who sended the message to Zyn
<Cadbury>: No, the complaints about his behavior line. Who complained?
<EdAWACS>: Sounds like a Staff member
<EdAWACS>: No idea
<Cadbury>: Then the other staff, then.
<EdAWACS>: Also why ask Zyn when they could have asked us?
<EdAWACS>: That was what I though
<Cadbury>: Abrasion. You know him?
<EdAWACS>: Hock?
<EdAWACS>: Yes
<EdAWACS>: But who would complain to abrasion?
<Cadbury>: Abrasion's an SCP guy too. He's poised to aim for Staffship.
<EdAWACS>: on 05?
<Cadbury>: Ours. He PM'd me.
<EdAWACS>: I see
<Cadbury>: Asking who's most likely to become CI Staff next
<EdAWACS>: The next round of promotions aren't commencing for some time
<Cadbury>: Told him it's not an available thing to say.
<EdAWACS>: Good
<Cadbury>: Strate's on
<EdAWACS>: On where?
<Cadbury>: basesix
<Cadbury>: Sent him a Pm to get here
<EdAWACS>: tell him to come to SSSC
<Cadbury>: Done
<Cadbury>: Hey, how come QUAESITOR isn't on sometimes?
<EdAWACS>: ?
<VictorStrate>: Hey.
<Cadbury>: Good
<Cadbury>: Now remember this channel's name.
<EdAWACS>: someone set the channel key

EdAWACS set the channel to mode +k

<EdAWACS>: done
<EdAWACS>: So Strate
<Cadbury>: Strate.
<Cadbury>: Remember that.
<EdAWACS>: we're here to discuss AlexTSB
<EdAWACS>: This is also our first ever SSSC conference
<VictorStrate>: Alright, here I am.
<Cadbury>: So make it count.
<EdAWACS>: We haven't scheduled out a time for regular sessions
<Cadbury>: All agenda and matters on your mind
<Cadbury>: Nor is it likely that I have time for regular sessions
<VictorStrate>: Alright.
<EdAWACS>: Same here
<EdAWACS>: Now down to business
<Cadbury>: So, AlexTSB. Any say on him?
<VictorStrate>: Seems okay.
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury thought differently
<VictorStrate>: I can't see anything wrong, and it doesn't seem like he plans on making himself a problem anytime soon.
<VictorStrate>: Oh.
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury enlighten victor with your views
<Cadbury>: Generally, we narrowed it down that we need to either take prevention now or watch him for 1 week to see his progress on behavior
<VictorStrate>: "Progress"?
<Cadbury>: Ed, the 05 thread, por favor
<EdAWACS>: Whether he messes up or not
<VictorStrate>: Uh oh.
<EdAWACS>: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-903506/torin-blackguard-alextsb#post-2113585
<EdAWACS>: Keep that only in context but don't let that be a basis for judgement
<Cadbury>: .ch Kick, Redeem, Avatar of Vengeance
<QUAESITOR>: Cadbury: Kick
<Cadbury>: Heh
<VictorStrate>: Hm.
<EdAWACS>: SCP Foundation has a different set of rules than our site
<Cadbury>: That said, it's effective but..
<Cadbury>: Ed, your view
<EdAWACS>: I personally feel that we shouldn't judge him based on his record on other sites
<VictorStrate>: As do I.
<Cadbury>: Sax's joining
<EdAWACS>: I mean this isn't like the atmelfti issue where the spammer was found to have a history of spamming
<Cadbury>: Which I killed off
<Cadbury>: A four-spammer attack, really, that's scary
<EdAWACS>: Welcome Sax
<EdAWACS>: to SSSC
<Sax>: Evening.
<Cadbury>: Morning here
<Sax>: Anyways, you've all been keeping track of Torion?
<Cadbury>: Yep
<EdAWACS>: Yes I have Victor not so sure
<Cadbury>: Had some PM exchanges, a chat
<EdAWACS>: We're bringing him up to speed
<Sax>: Alright.
<Sax>: Since you guys run your own site,
<Sax>: How are you going to handle this?
<Cadbury>: Anyways, we're asking whether to monitor his progress or kick him now
<VictorStrate>: I don't feel we should do anything about Alex until he becomes a problem. If something happens and we need to take action, then we should, but I don't think we should do anything until then.
<EdAWACS>: I voted in support of monitoring his progress
<EdAWACS>: He hasn't violated any or our site rules as of yet
<EdAWACS>: I only had to call him out on using a sexual slur
<VictorStrate>: I agree with Ed.
<Cadbury>: Given that we have a considerable reaction time to problems, it's guaranteed proper disciplinary action can be taken quickly
<Cadbury>: But till then, we're deciding to keep an eye on him
<EdAWACS>: As for the ranting portion, it is irritating slightly but still not crossing the line
<Cadbury>: He's voiced out IRL problems in the past.
<VictorStrate>: If anything does happen it can be quickly cleaned up and the proper punishment can be given.
<EdAWACS>: I did advise him of course that he would flourish better if he was more civil
<VictorStrate>: But I don't feel that any of his punishments should be made more harsh because of his record.
<Cadbury>: Flourish. Taking that word with a pinch of salt
<Cadbury>: Of course, Victor
<EdAWACS>: The most I would offer is an official warning on the next infraction
<EdAWACS>: Than we enter banning stage
<VictorStrate>: Well, is that the normal protocol?
<Cadbury>: We shouldn't stack up our punishments on Torin with the ones from SCP
<Cadbury>: Yes.
<EdAWACS>: Since we have different rule sets
<VictorStrate>: Alright.
<EdAWACS>: What do you think Sax?
<Sax>: Looks alright to me.
<Sax>: I'm only nominal advice, anyways.
<Cadbury>: http://falchionvalley.wikidot.com/site-protocols Right there Victor
<Cadbury>: Or not
<Cadbury>: I'll add something if we agree on it
<EdAWACS>: Cadbury the site protocols need an update
<VictorStrate>: Ah.
<EdAWACS>: So all in favor of immediate disciplinary action say aye
<EdAWACS>: All in favor of pardon say yes
<Cadbury>: We need protocols. Now is the best time to think of one
<VictorStrate>: Yes.
<EdAWACS>: Hmmm…. yes we do
<VictorStrate>: I guess we can think of one, but I don't have much to say on the matter.
<Cadbury>: I'm thinking Infraction - Warning, Next Infraction - Warn with Revocation, Next Infraction - Revoke Membership
<EdAWACS>: I mean Cadburys addition on rules for users were vague at best
<EdAWACS>: So Staff Post, Official Warning, Revocation
<Cadbury>: We can set bans, if you like, but who's up to the task of seeing to it that bans are set and lifted as soon as it expires?
<EdAWACS>: I can try but it will be difficult for me seeing as now I have university
<Cadbury>: Revocation to these parts: Revoke with rights to rejoin, revoke with rights to rejoin suspended for __ hours/weeks, revoke permanently
<Cadbury>: Also, someone get this log copy-pasted somewhere safe
<EdAWACS>: No no that won't work
<Cadbury>: Why not?
<EdAWACS>: Seeing as the site is open I'm think they could rejoin with ease
<EdAWACS>: So how about this
<EdAWACS>: Revocation,
<Cadbury>: We…we..
<EdAWACS>: Than 24 hour ban
<Cadbury>: Close the site and enable applications?
<EdAWACS>: No
<Cadbury>: Wait, what about the 24-hour ban?
<EdAWACS>: I don't think just yet we need to implement that feature
<EdAWACS>: block and ban function, time it to 24 hours
<EdAWACS>: that's how it works
<Cadbury>: It proved effective during the spam attack
<EdAWACS>: yep
<Cadbury>: So, steps?
<Cadbury>: From warn to ban
<EdAWACS>: than for 2nd offense post ban?
<EdAWACS>: the duration? A week or?
<Cadbury>: than?
<Cadbury>: or then?
<EdAWACS>: Then
<Cadbury>: Victor, what's your opinion?
<VictorStrate>: I don't really have one. I think you guys know best on this, and I'm positive anything I can come up with or contribute will be a tad harsh. I'm not a very forgiving person.
<Cadbury>: Well then, Ed. Yours?
<EdAWACS>: Week ban
<EdAWACS>: And finally Perma
<EdAWACS>: The 3 strikes and your out principle
<Cadbury>: From warning, I mean
<Cadbury>: Three strikes? Two.
<EdAWACS>: ?
<EdAWACS>: only 2?
<Cadbury>: Two.
<EdAWACS>: why only 2 strikes
<EdAWACS>: That seems a bit overboard
<EdAWACS>: Explain why should there only be 2 strikes
<Cadbury>: It's harsh, I know.
<VictorStrate>: Honestly, I agree with Cad in this case.
<Cadbury>: But really, three? Two already merits a pattern for me
<EdAWACS>: did you include the formal warning?
<EdAWACS>: when you counted 2?
<VictorStrate>: Three strikes and a warning seems a bit too nice, and won't do much against people that intend to be repeat offenders.
<Cadbury>: Yes
<VictorStrate>: I don't believe 2 counts the formal warning.
<VictorStrate>: Oh.
<EdAWACS>: well if we incorporate the warning along with 2 strikes
<Cadbury>: Define the formal warning, though
<EdAWACS>: That could work
<EdAWACS>: AS in an official warning
<VictorStrate>: Like the warning you gave me after the Shrek Skirmish.
<VictorStrate>: That sort of formal warning.
<EdAWACS>: That wasn't official really
<VictorStrate>: Oh.
<EdAWACS>: That was an administrator post
<Cadbury>: Well aren't they the same thing?
<VictorStrate>: Explain the difference.
<EdAWACS>: Official warnings are only given in PM form
<Cadbury>: Admin posts have more gravity, Ed. We should use them rarely.
<VictorStrate>: Ah.
<EdAWACS>: Had you received an official warning
<Cadbury>: PM form. Alright.
<VictorStrate>: So, is that all you wanted me for, or is there something else you wanted to discuss?
<EdAWACS>: I would have stated that your actions have been submitted for disipline
<VictorStrate>: Ah.
<Cadbury>: Well, I just want to say Halsey, Steffie and Braise are the rising stars of this site
<VictorStrate>: So, anything else we need to discuss?
<VictorStrate>: Good.
<Cadbury>: Hopes held high, gentlemen
<EdAWACS>: Other than the pressing issue of AlexTSB
<VictorStrate>: Well, I guess I'll be off..
<EdAWACS>: There isn't really much else we need to discuss here
<EdAWACS>: Another thing
<Cadbury>: Well, that's it for me. I need to go.
<Cadbury>: What?
<EdAWACS>: Anyone been saving the logs for this?
<Cadbury>: Hold on
<VictorStrate>: And if you guys want to check out how Terror Bites is going, you can see the progress here.
<VictorStrate>: Here:http://victorsandbox.wikidot.com/terror-bites
<EdAWACS>: I don't know how to save all the words we were typing
<Cadbury>: I need feedback here: http://ci-sandbox.wikidot.com/drcaduceus3
<VictorStrate>: Ctrl+C, Ctrl+v.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License